顯示具有 children 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 children 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2013年6月23日 星期日

Mom Traumatized Avoids Discussing Emotional Issues With Children

A mother who holds the baggage of trauma has been seen refraining herself from discussing any emotional issue at length with their children.

And this is what a study reveals which shows a big impact of mother's experiences on her style of parenting.

Why a mother does avoid discussing emotional issues?

When a mother herself undergoes a great deal of trauma in her childhood, the memories is so strong in her mind that she sometimes fails to recover out of them. And this becomes a part of her personality. The trauma is so deep seated that it does not come out of her mental system. And whenever she comes across anything similar to the same, she is correlates or remembers her own tragic moments. A person with such a mental state finds it difficult to listen to any such issue, leave alone providing a solution to it.

How does it affect the child?

The childhood of a child comes once. And this is the time when many issues crop up, which may need a stable handling and an emotional understanding too. The first person a child falls back upon is the mother for any kind of emergency he is into.

This means, if the mother is not quite stable emotionally, then she may not be able to meet the requirements of motherhood.

In the process the gap in the child's life would remain as it is without being resolved. Hence, leaving the child's story an incomplete one where he could not learn to handle an emotional issue because he could not get an opportunity to imbibe it from his mother.

What is the way out?

Keeping the future generation in mind, whenever a child undergoes any emotional trauma, the adults or the parents around should take charge of the situation and ensure that it is out of the system of the victim. Otherwise, it is seen to be leaving a deep scar on one's mind affecting the entire personality.

Hence the counselling can be done either at home or a professional help can also be looked for.

What if the issue is not dealt on time?

With time, any emotional pain gets deeper and deeper leaving a large impact on the life of the person and the generation associated with him of her. It reflects in the behaviour and it also "shows upon" the various relationships one shares. Motherhood is certainly one of the important rather the most vital relationship and it gets affected largely.

Summary

They say, for a child to be happy, a mother has to be happy first. Hence, a traumatized mother would certainly feel uncomfortable accepting or witnessing something similar in her child's life. To handle the same would be another mammoth task for. In spite of bets of her intentions and wishes she may not be able to deliver at this juncture and therefore there would be another personality growing up "not so competent" to handle an emotional turmoil in life.


View the original article here

2013年6月15日 星期六

I resent my older partner's demanding children

Resent older partner's demanding children 'We don’t spend as much time together as we would like, and this situation makes me feel second best.' Photograph: Kay Blaschke/Getty Images/Stock4B Creative

I have been seeing an older man for just over six months now. He is wonderful and I love him. He has three grownup children who are a similar age to me. I feel guilty for saying this but I resent them. They are extremely demanding. Despite them all having jobs they expect him to pay for everything and drive them everywhere, at any time of day or night. It is impacting on our relationship; we don't spend half as much time together as we would like, and it is making me feel second best. Should I accept that I?am not his priority or try to make him?compromise?

When leaving a message on this page, please be sensitive to the fact that you are responding to a real person in the grip of a real-life dilemma, who wrote to Private Lives asking for help, and may well view your comments here. Please consider especially how your words or the tone of your message could be perceived by someone in this situation, and be aware that comments which appear to be disruptive or disrespectful to the individual concerned will be removed.

‧ If you would like fellow readers to respond to a dilemma of yours, send us an outline of the situation of around 150 words. For advice from Pamela Stephenson Connolly on sexual matters, send us a brief description of your concerns.

‧ All correspondence should reach us by Wednesday morning. Email: private.lives@guardian.co.uk (please don't send attachments).


View the original article here

2013年6月8日 星期六

I don't want children but worry my husband is getting broody

pushchair pram A 27-year-old woman enjoys her lifestyle too much to want children, but worries her husband is getting broody. Photograph: Linda Nylind for the Guardian

The dilemma I am 27 years old and have been very happily married for five years. We always talked about having a family once my husband got a permanent job (up until last year he was completing his PhD) and, although I never felt broody, I always assumed that would come as I got older. However, although I do not dislike children, I increasingly have no desire for my own. Since the arrival of my nephew two years ago, my husband has become increasingly broody. I know I?am selfish, but I enjoy my comfortable life with plenty of time and disposable income to do the things I love.

My husband is loving and supportive, and I am not afraid he would leave me, but he would be really disappointed.? I can talk to him about most things, but I don't feel I can be honest with him about this, as it feels as if I tricked him.

Do I wait and hope I get broody, be honest with my husband and face his disappointment, or have children and risk being an awful mother?

Mariella replies How much we take for granted! Reading your letter brought to mind the millions of women across the globe for whom the wherewithal to make such choices remains a distant dream. For so many of our sex having a choice about pregnancy is as alien a possibility as discovering life on Mars. It's why Melinda Gates is charging around the universe offering her wisdom, and more helpfully her money, to long-suffering sisters whose short lives are punctuated by carrying children in double figures before they finally keel over. Imagine how much less you'd be enjoying your pleasingly self-indulgent lifestyle if every time you had sex with your husband (his choice, not yours) meant producing another child. A child whose chances of surviving into adulthood were as slim as yours of surviving each new gestation.

Therefore it was with mixed feelings that I read your letter. On the one hand I'm delighted that the rights we've been fighting tooth and nail for over the past century are finally offering women alternatives. 20th-century suffragettes would have been boggle-eyed with wonder at the lives we live now, unfettered from motherhood, dependency, domesticity and drudgery. Only 100 short years ago our fates, family size and government were entirely determined by the men we married. So why is that it I'm not waving my bra around my head and chanting "Germaine, Germaine" at this latest happy news from the frontline of 21st-century feminine freedom?

Instead, I'm anxious about the absence of profundity in your decision-making. You give me no indication of the "things you love", but they appear to centre on disposable income. Deciding whether or not to have kids is, happily, your prerogative. But to treat it so lightly, to squander the extraordinary gift women alone have been given, because you're enjoying your present "lifestyle" seems a hollow victory for those aforementioned campaigners for women's dignity and rights.

Whether or not you embrace motherhood isn't at the crux of my misgivings. I'm more worried about what's driving your life choices. Enjoying yourself is very important, but if it's solely predicated on your spending power then you are sentencing yourself to a puddle-deep experience on this earth.

You're 27! I saw a magazine cover the other day picturing a baby, newly born, with the headline "only 116 years to go". On this basis you've got another 70 years of marriage ahead. Discussing and making choices about how your relationship might evolve is at the core of its survival. You say your husband won't leave you and possibly you're right, but that doesn't make it any less necessary to work towards conclusions together. With the potential of seven further decades to go, it's quite a challenge to simply spin it out "having fun".

Neither should you predicate having a family on a whimsical emotion like feeling "broody". Plenty of women don't find themselves consumed by that urgent desire until so late into their fertility that it's too late. You may conclude parenting isn't for you, but what kind of mother you'll be is a mystery only revealed when you take that miniscule bundle of life you've created into your arms. Don't undervalue the choices you now have, or take for granted the happiness you presently enjoy in your relationship. To that end, communicating your fears is every bit as vital as having fun.

f you have a dilemma, send a brief email to mariella.frostrup@observer.co.uk. Follow Mariella on Twitter @mariellaf1


View the original article here